Let's just say that this particular decision is above my pay grade. Hubert
On 3/24/06, Alexandre Poitras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why do you want to use JSP? JSP is not a very good choice for JSF > applications, there are way better choice out there. > > But if you absolutely want to use JSP, Shale Clay can work in a JSP mode. > On 3/24/06, Hubert Rabago <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/24/06, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Greg Reddin wrote: > > > > If you'/re starting from scratch with no knowledge of Tiles, I'd > > > > recommend starting with Facelets or Clay. I have no experience with > > > > either, but, as has been pointed out already, they are "native" JSF > > > > technologies, whereas Tiles was conceived in a world without JSF and > > > > the integration can be problematic. > > > > > > I can second that, although the tiles approach in JSF is way saner with > > > 1/3rd less glue code in xml thank in Struts, it still is a somewhat > > > rough experience, with many internal issues. > > > If you can, omit tiles and go for something else. > > > The options have been mentioned. > > > > From what I understand, Facelets doesn't work with JSP. Neither does > > Clay. Are there alternatives to Tiles that I can use with JSF that > > work with JSP? (...and doesn't have the Tiles problems mentioned in > > this thread?) > > > > Hubert > > > > > -- > Alexandre Poitras > Québec, Canada >
