Barbara,
In a message dated 2009.11.16 15:53 -0500, Barbara Duprey wrote:
OK, I've got another draft here (mine on the left, John's on the right).
Very little difference in size, now, and I think all the essential
points are covered. Comments?
It's great, except that you might want to consider these alternatives:
[A] Responding to the digest message itself will not work. Instead, open the
relevant attachment with your mail client, and ensure that your reply goes to
[email protected] and not directly to the author of the message. Reply All
will automatically insert both addresses.
- OR -
[B] To reply to any message, hit Reply-All to *make your reply go to the list*. Also, as a courtesy, please delete the address in the "To:" header of your reply.
(1) I think we need to emphasize Reply All; otherwise the reply will
not go to the list but to an individual. [You do say "ensure that your
reply goes to [email protected]", but if we are worried about
clueless correspondents...]
(2) After Reply All (which includes CC:list), it would be courteous
to remove the To: address.
<The more I consider the contortions into which we bend ourselves to try
to make this idiot-proof and considerate to all, the more I wonder about
the merits of unsubscribed posting.>
John
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
