On Wednesday 11 August 2010 12:01, Michelle Konzack wrote: [snip]
> Imagine, there are subscribers with one address to GET messages to read > it if there are e.g. in office, but use anoter mail, e.g here business > one to send messages. > > This is what I do. > This is similar to what a some other users do as well (read on one account but post on another), but in their case they do it to avoid spam. Both are subscribed addresses but all mails coming to the post address are dumped at the server or filtered at the email client. In your case you should subscribe your SEND address as well and filter all messages you recieve from the list on your send address to the trash on your server if you can. You should do the subscribe by emailing from your send adress to [email protected] > I have setup a filter on my server which copy from my subscribed account > all of my own (important) threads to my business account (used over GSM > 24/7) and I can read it. Your business address will pick up more and more spam over time if you use it on mailing lists. Half my current spam crop is in other languages now because of this. > So, no message lost. > > But when I complaint for some days, I have gotten the message over the > LIST, and <linux4michelle> PLUS <michelle.konzack> Doing what i said above will prevent your issue. You will still get two copies (i don't think you can set NOMAIL on a colabnet mailing list as you can on a mailman list) but one can be filtered. > The real question was, if I send with <linux4michelle> why does he > include my private account <michelle.konzack>? Because your send address is not subscribed, and many of us have set rules to identify who is not subscribed. Most everybody will "Reply All" on unsubscribed accounts to ensure the OP gets a copy of the mail. That is why you get two copies. -- Michael --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
