>>>>> "Jonathon" == Jonathon Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jonathon> Uwe wrote:
>> This is uncomfortable,
Jonathon> Your options are:
Jonathon> a) Use a tool that is known to cause , and will cause
Jonathon> _all_ your data
Jonathon> results to be invalid. (A spreadsheet)
Jonathon> b) Learn a new tool. (A database.)
Jonathon> Pick option A, and explain to your oversight committee
Jonathon> why your data is corrupt.
Right, I agree in principle.
I know the basics of the data base, and must say that the
spreadsheet is more comfortable, for example printing tables is not
easily possible, to operate between columns by functions is less
comfortable. Etc etc
So there seems no solution besides a macro solution which seems not to
exists.
Jonathon> [At least the Human Genome Project got to publish a
Jonathon> paper explaining why 25% of their data was invalid.
Jonathon> They couldn't tell you which 25% it was, though.]
Didn't now that one.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
