> [Note subject line changed to more meaningful content.] > > And when did this become your personal list, Marco? James K's help, with or > without "meaningful subjects" is far more helpful than this sniping. I know, > you said "thank you." It's still cheap shots at a valuable contributor.
I have to agree with Marco on this: as much as I admire James' determination in reading and replying to all these emails without subject, I also think that it does not take too long to change the subject (certainly less than replying). By doing this, other volunteers could contribute to providing an even more comprehensive reply to the query. If it was only me systematically ignoring messages without a meaningful subject not much would be lost, but I guess I am not alone following this strategy. > > May I suggest that you start your own list if you want to control the content > and form of the postings. I think Marco has just limited himself to reminding everybody the rules of this list. And even if these weren't rules of this list, many people expressed support for the suggestion of inserting a meaningful subject when the person who asked a question failed for whatever reason to do so. Cheers, Michele --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
