On 04/13/2008 10:44 PM, Ganesha Bhaskara wrote: > > NoOp wrote: >> >> BTW: where are you getting M6 from? M3 installed fine for me (.deb >> files), but M5 keeps wanting to be king of the hill and take over my 2.4.0. > > ftp://ftp.linux.cz/pub/localization/OpenOffice.org/devel/DEV300/DEV300_m6/Build-1 > > This is Pavel Janik's build. >
Thanks - got it. Whew, that build doesn't install to ooo-dev and instead installs to /opt/openoffice.org3.0, so it took me awhile to figure out how to get 2.3.1, 2.4.0, and 3.0M6 all working on the same machine. 2.3.1 exhibits the problem described by the OP - but not consistent - meaning that sometimes it goes into cpu overload, other times not. Sometimes can open, sometimes not - very odd. 2.4.0 & 3.0M6 open OK, but 3.0M6 is definitely slower in opening. Additionally, the document spacing is different between the two. Example: - page 20 in M6 shows 'Student' thru 'Afstudeer coördinator'. - Page 20 in 2.4.0 'maart t/m mei 2007 literatuurstudie' thru 'Student'. Both running on the same system, both are open at the same time & using the same fonts. I'm not sure where the spacing problem comes from. I wonder if the problem on 2.3.1 & SO8/9 and 2.4.0 (see below) are related to the fact that the document is basically a 21 page table. I also found that if I select the table in 2.4.0 and give it borders, I get a cpu overload (this is a 2.4Ghz/1GB system). I do not have the same problem with 3.0M6. So it appears to be a problem in the 2.x as you mentioned in your initial reply. My guess would be that he would not encounter the problem if he'd have used frames instead of a 21 page table. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
