2008/6/16 Lisi Reisz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Monday 16 June 2008 06:05:48 Larry Gusaas wrote: > > Gene Heskett, 2008/06/15 10:50 PM: > > > Is kmail loosing its mind, or am I. First I can't seem to get it to > > > remember > > > that any replies I send to THIS list are supposed to go through gmail, > > > not > > > verizon. And apparently it also doesn't do me any good to hit the > > > reply-all > > > button either. > > > > This list inserts the header "Reply-To: [email protected]" which > > overrides the "From:" header when you use reply-all in properly behaved > > email clients. Thunderbird respects this header and it seems that kmail > > does as well. Some email clients do not properly ignore the from header > > and send a reply to that address as well. Some people disagree with this > > statement – I've had arguments with them in the past. > > Kmail 1.9.9 on my box replies to all. It doesn't "respect this header". > It > does what I ask it to. I much prefer it to do my bidding. I am, after > all, > the user. > > Lisi, I'm not sure this is correct. The "personal" e-mail address I use to send to this list is configured so that its "Reply to" value is set to " [email protected]". And I never get messages addressed to that personal address unless someone explicitly includes it in their To: or cc: list. In particular, your messages never come to that personal address but only to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]".
Unless you only use Reply All to unsubscribed posters??? But that would still mean you having to take special action for them, as compared to subscribed posters. -- Harold Fuchs London, England Please reply *only* to [email protected]
