I just wanted to thank Jeremy, Scott, and Linda for recommending Effective
Java. I read through the book this week. It's wonderful -- accessible and
useful. Now I'm in the process of refactoring my project to start applying
the concepts.

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Carlo Camerino <cmcamer...@gmail.com> wrote:

> we used to be bugzilla, mediawiki, continuum statck.we moved to Trac. It
> was
> simply amazing with all those plugins.
>
> Code Review WIth Trac Is Good.
> Review Board is also good software but it doesn't suit our programming
> needs.
>
> On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Matt Welch <matt...@welchkin.net> wrote:
>
> >
> > Tools that our team is using (after some trial and error):
> >
> > IDE - Eclipse/IDEA
> > Source Control - SVN
> > Build - Maven
> > Local Network Maven Repo - Nexus (after a year trying different ones)
> > Build Server  - TeamCity, which absolutely rocks (We actually purchased
> and
> > used Bamboo for 9 months. I can't believe it comes from the same company
> as
> > JIRA. Bamboo was terrible.)
> > Story Mgmt/Defects - Rally (hosted commercial app for agile projects; not
> > bad, but not fantastic either)
> > Code Review - Code Collaborator (again not bad and I'd rather have it
> than
> > nothing at all, but could be better)
> >
> >
> > Our QA team has used various testing tools from expensive commercial
> tools
> > like Mercury (now HP) Quality Center to Selenium. They use Rally for
> defect
> > management.
> >
> > My highest recommendations are for TeamCity, Nexus, and SVN.
> >
> > -Matt
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> >
> http://www.nabble.com/Tools-for-Managing-a-Wicket-Project-tp23299396p23334970.html
> > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
>

Reply via email to