because none of the core committers are designers... -igor
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 4:00 AM, Jing Ge (Besitec IT DEHAM) <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks you guys(Igor, Alex, Riyad) for the suggestions. I really appreciated. > > I mean the design, which is used by the wicket demo page, could be considered > as the default design of the wicket, right? So, why not provide a better one > here. > > Regards! > Jing > > -----Original Message----- > From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Montag, 1. Februar 2010 19:15 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: better look & modern css for wicket > > frameworks like Click and Vaadin have to provide default L&F because > it is harder to customize that since they do not offer as much control > over the markup as Wicket. in Wicket the designer has almost complete > control, even including the tags themselves. we can provide a fancy > L&F but then it will only work with the specific tag hierarchies that > we create it for which will limit the power of Wicket if you wanted to > use the L&F in your app. > > -igor > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Jing Ge (Besitec IT DEHAM) > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> I just ask myself, why the wicket team does not provide a better look, >> more modern css? A css which will let people say "WOW!" when they open >> the wicket demo page, like Vaadin does. >> >> Such a css can let more people pay attention to wicket. Why don't do it? >> >> >> BTW, The wicket is really cool! I like it! >> >> Regards >> Jing >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Peter Karich [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Freitag, 29. Januar 2010 17:42 >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: Apache Click >> >> Hi, >> >> for me the main disadvantage of click is that it uses velocity instead >> pure html. >> Then click has probably less publicity/mailing support and less >> components. >> An advantage could be that cayenne is supported as a default persistent >> solution. >> >> Search for wicket vs click or sth. like (was useful for me). >> >> > I think wicket with a good look css can beat them. >> >> This is the great thing about wicket: just let the designer do the >> design their html ;-) and I will code (fast!). >> No need for GSP, JSF, rhtml, JSP, velocity, xslt ... >> >> Regards, >> Peter. >> >>> Wow! >>> >>> Vaadin looks really cool! >>> Could anyone here provide a good look css for the wicket? I think >> wicket >>> with a good look css can beat them. >>> >>> Regards! >>> Jing >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Martin Makundi [mailto:[email protected]] >>> Sent: Freitag, 29. Januar 2010 17:14 >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: Apache Click >>> >>> Hi! >>> >>> I guess click comes with its own layout.. like Vaadin >>> http://demo.vaadin.com/sampler/ >>> >>> ** >>> Martin >>> >>> 2010/1/29 Giovanni<[email protected]>: >>> >>>> Apache Click is very similar to Wicket: >>>> >>>> http://incubator.apache.org/click/ >>>> >>>> What are the main differences and advantages? >>>> >>>> regards >>>> giovanni >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Free your timetabling! >> http://timefinder.sourceforge.net/ >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
