Hi, Thanks you guys(Igor, Alex, Riyad) for the suggestions. I really appreciated.
I mean the design, which is used by the wicket demo page, could be considered as the default design of the wicket, right? So, why not provide a better one here. Regards! Jing -----Original Message----- From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Montag, 1. Februar 2010 19:15 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: better look & modern css for wicket frameworks like Click and Vaadin have to provide default L&F because it is harder to customize that since they do not offer as much control over the markup as Wicket. in Wicket the designer has almost complete control, even including the tags themselves. we can provide a fancy L&F but then it will only work with the specific tag hierarchies that we create it for which will limit the power of Wicket if you wanted to use the L&F in your app. -igor On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Jing Ge (Besitec IT DEHAM) <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi guys, > > I just ask myself, why the wicket team does not provide a better look, > more modern css? A css which will let people say "WOW!" when they open > the wicket demo page, like Vaadin does. > > Such a css can let more people pay attention to wicket. Why don't do it? > > > BTW, The wicket is really cool! I like it! > > Regards > Jing > > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Karich [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Freitag, 29. Januar 2010 17:42 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Apache Click > > Hi, > > for me the main disadvantage of click is that it uses velocity instead > pure html. > Then click has probably less publicity/mailing support and less > components. > An advantage could be that cayenne is supported as a default persistent > solution. > > Search for wicket vs click or sth. like (was useful for me). > > > I think wicket with a good look css can beat them. > > This is the great thing about wicket: just let the designer do the > design their html ;-) and I will code (fast!). > No need for GSP, JSF, rhtml, JSP, velocity, xslt ... > > Regards, > Peter. > >> Wow! >> >> Vaadin looks really cool! >> Could anyone here provide a good look css for the wicket? I think > wicket >> with a good look css can beat them. >> >> Regards! >> Jing >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Martin Makundi [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Freitag, 29. Januar 2010 17:14 >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: Apache Click >> >> Hi! >> >> I guess click comes with its own layout.. like Vaadin >> http://demo.vaadin.com/sampler/ >> >> ** >> Martin >> >> 2010/1/29 Giovanni<[email protected]>: >> >>> Apache Click is very similar to Wicket: >>> >>> http://incubator.apache.org/click/ >>> >>> What are the main differences and advantages? >>> >>> regards >>> giovanni >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> >> > > > -- > Free your timetabling! > http://timefinder.sourceforge.net/ > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
