go for it. anyone can organize it. we would be happy to accept a patch against wicket-examples.
-igor On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:19 AM, nino martinez wael <[email protected]> wrote: > So why not have a competition? We could host it with the wicketstuff svn and > take the best one and accept it as default? > > 2010/2/2 Igor Vaynberg <[email protected]> > >> because none of the core committers are designers... >> >> -igor >> >> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 4:00 AM, Jing Ge (Besitec IT DEHAM) >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Thanks you guys(Igor, Alex, Riyad) for the suggestions. I really >> appreciated. >> > >> > I mean the design, which is used by the wicket demo page, could be >> considered as the default design of the wicket, right? So, why not provide a >> better one here. >> > >> > Regards! >> > Jing >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[email protected]] >> > Sent: Montag, 1. Februar 2010 19:15 >> > To: [email protected] >> > Subject: Re: better look & modern css for wicket >> > >> > frameworks like Click and Vaadin have to provide default L&F because >> > it is harder to customize that since they do not offer as much control >> > over the markup as Wicket. in Wicket the designer has almost complete >> > control, even including the tags themselves. we can provide a fancy >> > L&F but then it will only work with the specific tag hierarchies that >> > we create it for which will limit the power of Wicket if you wanted to >> > use the L&F in your app. >> > >> > -igor >> > >> > On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Jing Ge (Besitec IT DEHAM) >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi guys, >> >> >> >> I just ask myself, why the wicket team does not provide a better look, >> >> more modern css? A css which will let people say "WOW!" when they open >> >> the wicket demo page, like Vaadin does. >> >> >> >> Such a css can let more people pay attention to wicket. Why don't do it? >> >> >> >> >> >> BTW, The wicket is really cool! I like it! >> >> >> >> Regards >> >> Jing >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: Peter Karich [mailto:[email protected]] >> >> Sent: Freitag, 29. Januar 2010 17:42 >> >> To: [email protected] >> >> Subject: Re: Apache Click >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> for me the main disadvantage of click is that it uses velocity instead >> >> pure html. >> >> Then click has probably less publicity/mailing support and less >> >> components. >> >> An advantage could be that cayenne is supported as a default persistent >> >> solution. >> >> >> >> Search for wicket vs click or sth. like (was useful for me). >> >> >> >> > I think wicket with a good look css can beat them. >> >> >> >> This is the great thing about wicket: just let the designer do the >> >> design their html ;-) and I will code (fast!). >> >> No need for GSP, JSF, rhtml, JSP, velocity, xslt ... >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Peter. >> >> >> >>> Wow! >> >>> >> >>> Vaadin looks really cool! >> >>> Could anyone here provide a good look css for the wicket? I think >> >> wicket >> >>> with a good look css can beat them. >> >>> >> >>> Regards! >> >>> Jing >> >>> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >> >>> From: Martin Makundi [mailto:[email protected]] >> >>> Sent: Freitag, 29. Januar 2010 17:14 >> >>> To: [email protected] >> >>> Subject: Re: Apache Click >> >>> >> >>> Hi! >> >>> >> >>> I guess click comes with its own layout.. like Vaadin >> >>> http://demo.vaadin.com/sampler/ >> >>> >> >>> ** >> >>> Martin >> >>> >> >>> 2010/1/29 Giovanni<[email protected]>: >> >>> >> >>>> Apache Click is very similar to Wicket: >> >>>> >> >>>> http://incubator.apache.org/click/ >> >>>> >> >>>> What are the main differences and advantages? >> >>>> >> >>>> regards >> >>>> giovanni >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Free your timetabling! >> >> http://timefinder.sourceforge.net/ >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> >> >> >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
