On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 00:45:26 -0400, Brian Topping wrote: > There's *always* a cost, but which one is cheapest (most efficient, > easiest to use, yada yada) in the end depends on a lot of localized > factors. If it did not, there would be a website that every developer > visited before starting a new project, and the anointed "best > technologies" for that moment would be listed there. Heck, you would be > able check boxes on the list and generate a POM from it...
Very true. It is precisely the diversity of what the cost (TCO, etc.) is that allows project like Wicket to get off the ground. If nobody had been willing to try doing J2EE in a different way, then where would Wicket be? Cheers, Sam. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
