Thanks Chris, I'll never heard of it. It sounds pretty cool. I'll check it
out.

On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 10:33 PM, Chris Colman
<[email protected]>wrote:

> We use Wicket with DataNucleus (JDO) www.datanucleus.org as the
> persistence layer. The persistence side is truly transparent and it
> performs really well - your model objects don't need any extra methods
> and you are free to model and code just as if you were dealing with an
> 'in memory' only set of objects.
>
> We also use the 'Exposed Domain Model' pattern/strategy which is another
> productivity boost over many of the other more traditional approaches to
> persistence.
>
> Regards,
> Chris
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Francisco Diaz Trepat - gmail
> [mailto:[email protected]]
> >Sent: Monday, 4 October 2010 10:40 AM
> >To: Wicket-Users
> >Subject: New App - Best Practices
> >
> >Hi I've tested wicket before it was in the apache incubator and found
> >it to be awesome, since then we have adopted it and I have been
> >migrating all legacy applications for my company for the last 3 years
> >aprox.
> >
> >Now I have to build a small app to manage small accounting and
> >logistics for my wife's """"Business""""
> >
> >She is opening a small printing shop for small business labels, such
> >as wine bottle labels, clothing labels, bags, etc.
> >
> >At work I use wicket with an "ingenious" CORBA server, courtesy of the
> >legacy applications.
> >
> >Now I am free to do whatever I want. This is the worst part. :-)
> >
> >I would like to help out and test maybe wicket 1.5 and some good
> >database solution.
> >
> >Can you share some comments or recommendations on what to do?
> >For Instance, I once read about Active Objects, I pretty much liked
> >the idea and built some prototypes, but now the site is exactly the
> >same and found their latest released is from 2008. So that is no so
> >edgy...
> >
> >I don't wish to use hibernate, but could be some other "object
> >relational mapping", even hibernate if you insist... :-)
> >
> >So, ideas on what to use?
> >
> >UI = Wicket.
> >    + 1.4?
> >    + 1.5?
> >middle layer?
> >Persistence?
> >
> >Thanks in advance,
> >f(t)
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to