>> I don't think it is. Keeping the two hierarchies in sync is not really that >> difficult. The funny thing about the proposed approach is that it is in an >> effort to make things "simpler". But, as you pointed out, the more complex >> things won't work with the proposed approach (without probably some huge >> amount of hacks). So, the complex stays complex, and is then inconsistent >> with how all the other stuff works. > > I agree. It's a bad idea. We should learn from other frameworks and > our own past mistakes that consistency is everything. There's no doubt > in my mind that this short cut would backfire at some point (and > probably sooner than later). Instead, the focus should be on improving > error diagnostics etc.
Duh.. I think there can be _no_ excuse to not reduce manual work where it is really not needed. It's not like we are talking about airline autopilots here. ** Martin > > Eelco > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
