assuming you are using a repeater say dataview/gridview,think about that in this way 200*200==40k items of repeater,are you rendering that number of items at once? i would have used a small table with navigator or some ajax scroll behavior ..
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 6:11 PM, lukuperman <lukuper...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Hello all, I am working on an application that was built with Wicket 1.4.15. > It has to show a table with an AjaxCheckBox on each cell. Most of the final > html size is because of the inline ajax behavior on each cb (ie 20Mb for a > 200x200 table). Leaving aside the fact of rendering big tables (which is > imposed by business), can you give me some hints or ideas on how can I > decrease final html size maintaining ajax behavior? For example, how can I: > > -centralize the javascript and make checkboxes call it passing the minimum > parameters needed (id, etc) > -or event registration, without migrating to Wicket 6 (not allowed to) > -some other way? > > Thank you! > Lucas > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Centralizing-ajax-inline-javascript-tp4652499.html > Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > -- regards, Vineet Semwal --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
