Did you drop it from the pom already so that joda is not visible in the scope?
2017-09-18 6:57 GMT+03:00 Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com>: > date-time module will not have joda-time dependency after moving > Other modules might have this dependency ... > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Martin Makundi > <martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote: > > Is it possible to also drop joda from wicketstuff for consistency? > > > > 2017-09-17 22:09 GMT+03:00 Andrea Del Bene <an.delb...@gmail.com>: > > > >> +1 to move legacy code to WicketStuff. For 'legacy code' I mean all the > >> code based on yui library and class StyleDateConverter which is > tailored on > >> Joda time. > >> > >> > >> > >> On 16/09/2017 14:13, Martin Grigorov wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Maxim, > >>> > >>> Since I do not use wicket-datetime in my apps I also wanted to break it > >>> hard by replacing Joda-Time with Java 8 classes. > >>> But people who use it expressed concerns that it will be hard to > migrate > >>> this way. Everyone will have to do the same for his/her application. > >>> I remember Igor even suggested to have univeral API that will work with > >>> java.util.Date, Joda-Time and Java 8! > >>> > >>> IMO the easiest thing that could be done is to copy the current code to > >>> WicketStuff, as https://github.com/wicketstuff/wicket1.5-tree, and > rework > >>> wicket-datetime to use Java 8 APIs. > >>> > >>> Martin Grigorov > >>> Wicket Training and Consulting > >>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov > >>> > >>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Maxim Solodovnik < > solomax...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hello Martin, > >>>> > >>>> I tried to continue this work, but it seems I need some information > >>>> before I can proceed > >>>> Could you please tell me What was the goal of these changes? > >>>> > >>>> I would remove joda-time, and use LocalDate, LocalTime instead of Date > >>>> As I can see you are using ZonedDateTime ... > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Martin Grigorov < > mgrigo...@apache.org> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Yes, if finished on time! > >>>>> Wicket 7 requires Java 7 > >>>>> > >>>>> Martin Grigorov > >>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting > >>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov > >>>>> > >>>>> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 3:34 PM, Rakesh A < > iamrakes...@rediffmail.com> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Is it going to be for Wicket 8 only ? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>> Rakesh.A > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Sent from: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Users-forum- > >>>>>> f1842947.html > >>>>>> > >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ > --------- > >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> WBR > >>>> Maxim aka solomax > >>>> > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >> > >> > > > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >
