IMO it's better to big mang whole wicket to drop joda date. All wicket 8
without joda.

**
Martin

2017-09-18 22:43 GMT+03:00 Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org>:

> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 6:50 AM, Martin Makundi <
> martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
>
> > Is it possible to also drop joda from wicketstuff for consistency?
> >
>
> IMO, the WicketStuff module must be exactly the same as the one in Wicket
> 7.x.
> Any changes in the API should be done in Wicket 8.x.
> This way when users migrate their apps to 8.x they can decide to take the
> short route and use the WicketStuff module.
> Later they can invest in reworking their code to the new API and use again
> org.apache.wicket:wicket-datetime
> The WicketStuff module README should say that it will be available only for
> Wicket 8.x lifecycle, to prevent double maintenance.
>
>
> > 2017-09-17 22:09 GMT+03:00 Andrea Del Bene <an.delb...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > +1 to move legacy code to WicketStuff. For 'legacy code' I mean all the
> > > code based on yui library and class StyleDateConverter which is
> tailored
> > on
> > > Joda time.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 16/09/2017 14:13, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Maxim,
> > >>
> > >> Since I do not use wicket-datetime in my apps I also wanted to break
> it
> > >> hard by replacing Joda-Time with Java 8 classes.
> > >> But people who use it expressed concerns that it will be hard to
> migrate
> > >> this way. Everyone will have to do the same for his/her application.
> > >> I remember Igor even suggested to have univeral API that will work
> with
> > >> java.util.Date, Joda-Time and Java 8!
> > >>
> > >> IMO the easiest thing that could be done is to copy the current code
> to
> > >> WicketStuff, as https://github.com/wicketstuff/wicket1.5-tree, and
> > rework
> > >> wicket-datetime to use Java 8 APIs.
> > >>
> > >> Martin Grigorov
> > >> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> solomax...@gmail.com
> > >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hello Martin,
> > >>>
> > >>> I tried to continue this work, but it seems I need some information
> > >>> before I can proceed
> > >>> Could you please tell me What was the goal of these changes?
> > >>>
> > >>> I would remove joda-time, and use LocalDate, LocalTime instead of
> Date
> > >>> As I can see you are using ZonedDateTime ...
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> mgrigo...@apache.org
> > >
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Yes, if finished on time!
> > >>>> Wicket 7 requires Java 7
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Martin Grigorov
> > >>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > >>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 3:34 PM, Rakesh A <
> iamrakes...@rediffmail.com
> > >
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Is it going to be for Wicket 8 only ?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>> Rakesh.A
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> --
> > >>>>> Sent from: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Users-forum-
> > >>>>> f1842947.html
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
> > ---------
> > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> WBR
> > >>> Maxim aka solomax
> > >>>
> > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to