On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 8:12 AM, Martin Makundi < martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
> 2017-09-19 7:16 GMT+03:00 Martin Grigorov <martin.grigo...@gmail.com>: > > > On Sep 19, 2017 6:22 AM, "Martin Makundi" < > > martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote: > > > > IMO it's better to big mang whole wicket to drop joda date. All wicket 8 > > without joda. > > > > > > Said the person who still uses Wicket 1.4 for his apps... > > > > Yes, incremental change is a pain so we big bang 1.4 ->8. > > > > Everyone wants to see the Big Bang and this might be the reason to see > > Wicket 8.0.0 in 2020. > > > Dropping joda should not significantly slow down development. > True, if your name is Stephen Colebourne and you know both APIs by heart! I personally had to ask Google and StackOverflow.com several questions for what I've done so far in the branch mentioned above. My vote on whether to merge this rafectoring to master branch will depend on the diff in wicket-examples. > > > > > > > > ** > > Martin > > > > 2017-09-18 22:43 GMT+03:00 Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org>: > > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 6:50 AM, Martin Makundi < > > > martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Is it possible to also drop joda from wicketstuff for consistency? > > > > > > > > > > IMO, the WicketStuff module must be exactly the same as the one in > Wicket > > > 7.x. > > > Any changes in the API should be done in Wicket 8.x. > > > This way when users migrate their apps to 8.x they can decide to take > the > > > short route and use the WicketStuff module. > > > Later they can invest in reworking their code to the new API and use > > again > > > org.apache.wicket:wicket-datetime > > > The WicketStuff module README should say that it will be available only > > for > > > Wicket 8.x lifecycle, to prevent double maintenance. > > > > > > > > > > 2017-09-17 22:09 GMT+03:00 Andrea Del Bene <an.delb...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > > > +1 to move legacy code to WicketStuff. For 'legacy code' I mean all > > the > > > > > code based on yui library and class StyleDateConverter which is > > > tailored > > > > on > > > > > Joda time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 16/09/2017 14:13, Martin Grigorov wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Hi Maxim, > > > > >> > > > > >> Since I do not use wicket-datetime in my apps I also wanted to > break > > > it > > > > >> hard by replacing Joda-Time with Java 8 classes. > > > > >> But people who use it expressed concerns that it will be hard to > > > migrate > > > > >> this way. Everyone will have to do the same for his/her > application. > > > > >> I remember Igor even suggested to have univeral API that will work > > > with > > > > >> java.util.Date, Joda-Time and Java 8! > > > > >> > > > > >> IMO the easiest thing that could be done is to copy the current > code > > > to > > > > >> WicketStuff, as https://github.com/wicketstuff/wicket1.5-tree, > and > > > > rework > > > > >> wicket-datetime to use Java 8 APIs. > > > > >> > > > > >> Martin Grigorov > > > > >> Wicket Training and Consulting > > > > >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov > > > > >> > > > > >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Maxim Solodovnik < > > > solomax...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> Hello Martin, > > > > >>> > > > > >>> I tried to continue this work, but it seems I need some > information > > > > >>> before I can proceed > > > > >>> Could you please tell me What was the goal of these changes? > > > > >>> > > > > >>> I would remove joda-time, and use LocalDate, LocalTime instead of > > > Date > > > > >>> As I can see you are using ZonedDateTime ... > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Martin Grigorov < > > > mgrigo...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> Yes, if finished on time! > > > > >>>> Wicket 7 requires Java 7 > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Martin Grigorov > > > > >>>> Wicket Training and Consulting > > > > >>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 3:34 PM, Rakesh A < > > > iamrakes...@rediffmail.com > > > > > > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Hi, > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> Is it going to be for Wicket 8 only ? > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> Regards, > > > > >>>>> Rakesh.A > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> -- > > > > >>>>> Sent from: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n > > 4.nabble.com/Users-forum- > > > > >>>>> f1842947.html > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > --------- > > > > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > > > > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> -- > > > > >>> WBR > > > > >>> Maxim aka solomax > > > > >>> > > > > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > --------- > > > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > > > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > --------- > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
