+1 me too 2017-09-22 15:28 GMT+03:00 Andrea Del Bene <an.delb...@gmail.com>:
> +1 for me. But I doubt there will be something left in wicket-datetime > when you will remove Joda :-) > > > > On 22/09/2017 13:49, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > >> OK, I'm ready to start :) >> >> As far as I understand here is the plan: >> >> 1) move existing unchanged wicket-datetime to wicketstuff (8.0.0 only >> change package) >> 2) remove joda-time from wicket-datetime (pom, README.md) >> 3) use LocalDate/LocalDateTime where appropriate >> >> Shall I proceed :))) ? >> >> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 7:53 PM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >>> https://github.com/menodata/time4j - in case Java 8 Date APIs are not >>> good >>> enough >>> >>> Martin Grigorov >>> Wicket Training and Consulting >>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Martin Makundi < >>> martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote: >>> >>> 2017-09-19 9:35 GMT+03:00 Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org>: >>>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 8:12 AM, Martin Makundi < >>>>> martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> 2017-09-19 7:16 GMT+03:00 Martin Grigorov <martin.grigo...@gmail.com>: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sep 19, 2017 6:22 AM, "Martin Makundi" < >>>>>>> martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> IMO it's better to big mang whole wicket to drop joda date. All >>>>>>> >>>>>> wicket >>>> >>>>> 8 >>>>> >>>>>> without joda. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Said the person who still uses Wicket 1.4 for his apps... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, incremental change is a pain so we big bang 1.4 ->8. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Everyone wants to see the Big Bang and this might be the reason to >>>>>>> >>>>>> see >>>> >>>>> Wicket 8.0.0 in 2020. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Dropping joda should not significantly slow down development. >>>>>> >>>>>> True, if your name is Stephen Colebourne and you know both APIs by >>>>> heart! >>>>> I personally had to ask Google and StackOverflow.com several questions >>>>> >>>> for >>>> >>>>> what I've done so far in the branch mentioned above. >>>>> >>>>> My vote on whether to merge this rafectoring to master branch will >>>>> depend >>>>> on the diff in wicket-examples. >>>>> >>>>> Let's try it first. If it does not pass we can drop joda locally. So >>>> long >>>> as it is not a transient dependency it's doable. >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> ** >>>>>>> Martin >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2017-09-18 22:43 GMT+03:00 Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 6:50 AM, Martin Makundi < >>>>>>>> martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is it possible to also drop joda from wicketstuff for >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> consistency? >>>> >>>>> IMO, the WicketStuff module must be exactly the same as the one in >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Wicket >>>>>> >>>>>>> 7.x. >>>>>>>> Any changes in the API should be done in Wicket 8.x. >>>>>>>> This way when users migrate their apps to 8.x they can decide to >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> take >>>> >>>>> the >>>>>> >>>>>>> short route and use the WicketStuff module. >>>>>>>> Later they can invest in reworking their code to the new API and >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> use >>>> >>>>> again >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> org.apache.wicket:wicket-datetime >>>>>>>> The WicketStuff module README should say that it will be available >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> only >>>>> >>>>>> for >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Wicket 8.x lifecycle, to prevent double maintenance. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2017-09-17 22:09 GMT+03:00 Andrea Del Bene <an.delb...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> : >>>>> >>>>>> +1 to move legacy code to WicketStuff. For 'legacy code' I mean >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> all >>>>> >>>>>> the >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> code based on yui library and class StyleDateConverter which is >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> tailored >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Joda time. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 16/09/2017 14:13, Martin Grigorov wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Maxim, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Since I do not use wicket-datetime in my apps I also wanted to >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> break >>>>>> >>>>>>> it >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> hard by replacing Joda-Time with Java 8 classes. >>>>>>>>>>> But people who use it expressed concerns that it will be hard >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> to >>>> >>>>> migrate >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> this way. Everyone will have to do the same for his/her >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> application. >>>>>> >>>>>>> I remember Igor even suggested to have univeral API that will >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> work >>>>> >>>>>> with >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> java.util.Date, Joda-Time and Java 8! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> IMO the easiest thing that could be done is to copy the >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> current >>>> >>>>> code >>>>>> >>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> WicketStuff, as https://github.com/wicketstuff/wicket1.5-tree >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> , >>>> >>>>> and >>>>>> >>>>>>> rework >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> wicket-datetime to use Java 8 APIs. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov >>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting >>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Maxim Solodovnik < >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> solomax...@gmail.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hello Martin, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I tried to continue this work, but it seems I need some >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> information >>>>>> >>>>>>> before I can proceed >>>>>>>>>>>> Could you please tell me What was the goal of these changes? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I would remove joda-time, and use LocalDate, LocalTime >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> instead >>>> >>>>> of >>>>> >>>>>> Date >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> As I can see you are using ZonedDateTime ... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Martin Grigorov < >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> mgrigo...@apache.org >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, if finished on time! >>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket 7 requires Java 7 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov >>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 3:34 PM, Rakesh A < >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> iamrakes...@rediffmail.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is it going to be for Wicket 8 only ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rakesh.A >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 4.nabble.com/Users-forum- >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> f1842947.html >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>>> --------- >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> apache.org >>>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> WBR >>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> --------- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> --------- >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >
