> > ... > > Even though it's all the same $0.10/liter chemicals, with > varying amounts of > > perfume and marketing hype. > > > Dear Nat and All, > > Wouldn't it be better to write this as 0.10 $/L rather than $0.10/liter. > You're right Pat, it would. Same as density in g/ml. Nat
- [USMA:9884] Gillette continues to change Nikolay O. Malyarov
- [USMA:9893] RE: Gillette continues to change and TIDE kilopascal
- [USMA:9917] Gillette kilopascal
- [USMA:9919] RE: Gillette Bill Potts
- [USMA:9936] RE: Gillette kilopascal
- [USMA:9941] RE: Gillette Bill Potts
- [USMA:9946] RE: Gillette kilopascal
- [USMA:9958] RE: Gillette Nikolay O. Malyarov
- [USMA:9961] RE: Gillette Nat Hager III
- [USMA:10108] megadollars Pat Naughtin
- Nat Hager III
