On Saturday 25 March 2006 10:59, Jim Elwell wrote:
> Since I think this is inevitable, I also think we (and the BIPM)
> should embrace it so we can help control it. Just hoping it won't
> happen is fruitless.

I brought this up earlier with the tog. A tog is off by a factor of 10 from 
the SI unit of thermal insulation (kelvin square meter per watt). There ought 
to be a short name for the SI unit, else people will persist in using the 
tog. Maybe it should be called the coat?

Pierre

Reply via email to