On Tuesday 10 March 2009 12:33:06 Bill Hooper wrote: > I also agree with John Steele that, until there is some uniformity in > usage is obtained, substiting a three character alphabetic designation > for the month is desirable (even if not really standard). That, plus > insistence on using all four digits in the year, would make this: > 2009 Mar 10 > impossible to misinterpret no matter what other format would be more > familiar to anyone.
Unless you live in Wales, Poland, or Finland, where months could be abbreviated "Meh", "Lis", or "Jou". In particular, "marraskuu" is November, not March. Pierre
