On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 4:48 AM, Ron Stone <[email protected]> wrote:

> many of us may still be wondering how might MPGe be represented in SI
> (metric) terms.
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 4:26 AM, John M. Steele <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I must call foul, but I am unclear whether I am calling foul on:
>> *EPA's methodology
>> *Tesla's honesty
>> *Andrew's investigative reporting and numeracy
>> Quoting from the article,
>> ##
>> Now Tesla has raised the stakes again by introducing the Tesla Roadster
>> 2.5 that boasts an MPGe rating of 112 MPGe on the highway and 124 MPGe in
>> the city. This combined rating puts the overall MPGe for the Roadster 2.5 at
>> 119 MPGe.
>>
>> When the new 2.5 Tesla Roadsters will become available is anyone's guess.
>> However, with the original Roadster boasting an overall MPGe rating of 111
>> the improved 2.5 model is undoubtedly going to be a success. One interesting
>> thing to point out is that other than the more efficient MPGe rating the
>> rest of the Tesla Roadster 2.5 statistics *remain unchanged* from its
>> predecessor; i.e. annual fuel costs, approximate range, and *kW-hrs per
>> 100 miles*.
>>
>> ##
>>
>>
>>
>> 119 MPGe and 111 MPGe can not BOTH be represented by 30 kW·h/100 mi.
>> Using a DoE data sheet (and some conversion) reformulated gasoline (would
>> EPA use any other kind) is 119.87 MJ/gallon.  Using this figure, I confirm
>> that 111 MPGe is 30 kW·h/100 mi, but 119 MPGe is 28 kW·h/100 mi.  Obviously
>> the useful, meaningful expression of fuel economy for an electric vehicle is
>> just some decoration the EPA makes them throw on the label.
>>
>>
>>
>> It is not simple reporting error.  The labels have been previously
>> reported with graphics.  Only fake gallons are real!
>>
>> http://green.autoblog.com/2011/05/26/epa-rates-tesla-roadster-at-111-mpge/
>>
>>
>> http://news.consumerreports.org/cars/2011/05/extreme-epa-window-sticker-tesla-roadster-rated-111-mpge.html
>>
>>
>>
>> Pat and I challenge each other on conversion.  I am going to offer a new
>> defense of conversion:
>>
>> "He who can't convert in a 'dual' society gets hoodwinked."
>>
>> I agree with Pat that we need to get past conversion and truly metricate,
>> but we have a Congress that currently guarentees that can't happen because
>> they will  pass (and demonstrably have passed) laws to prevent it.  I blame
>> Congress, not centimeters.
>>   ------------------------------
>> *From:* Pat Naughtin <[email protected]>
>> *To:* U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]>
>> *Sent:* Sat, June 25, 2011 11:39:40 PM
>> *Subject:* [USMA:50743] MPGe = miles per gallon equivalent?
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> You will be interested in this reference from Reuters:
>> http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/06/24/idUS27637249720110624 where
>> they write:
>>
>>  So, the EPA had to come up with a new unit of measurement in order to
>> help the public understand all those crazy and complicated numbers.
>> Essentially, the EPA had to dumb stuff down so people could understand what
>> they were talking about- if the EPA has to make up a new system of
>> measurement to replace an existing system of measurement that is deemed to
>> tricky by the masses,* I guess this sort of puts the final nail in the
>> coffin for the metric system ever being adopted in the U.S.*
>>  I emphasised the last sentence of the quote. Better still, I will repeat
>> it here:
>>
>> *I guess this sort of puts the final nail in the coffin for the metric
>> system ever being adopted in the U.S.*
>>
>>       Cheers,
>>
>> Pat Naughtin LCAMS
>> Author of the ebook, *Metrication Leaders Guide,* see
>> http://metricationmatters.com/MetricationLeadersGuideInfo.html
>> Hear Pat speak at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_lshRAPvPZY
>> PO Box 305 Belmont 3216,
>> Geelong, Australia
>> Phone: 61 3 5241 2008
>>
>> Metric system consultant, writer, and speaker, Pat Naughtin, has helped
>> thousands of people and hundreds of companies upgrade to the modern metric
>> system smoothly, quickly, and so economically that they now save thousands
>> each year when buying, processing, or selling for their businesses. Pat
>> provides services and resources for many different trades, crafts, and
>> professions for commercial, industrial and government metrication leaders in
>> Asia, Europe, and in the USA. Pat's clients include the Australian
>> Government, Google, NASA, NIST, and the metric associations of Canada, the
>> UK, and the USA. See http://www.metricationmatters.com/ to subscribe.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> -----------------
> Ron Stone
> ----------------------------
> on Twitter (at) photonron
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> disclaimers or other restrictions may apply to this message.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>


-- 

-----------------
Ron Stone
----------------------------
on Twitter (at) photonron
---------------------------------------------------------
disclaimers or other restrictions may apply to this message.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to