I think we have 7 remaining unused bits in our maps currently, so using one of those to keep track of this sounds good to me.
-- Mads On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 3:28 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Kasper, Mads, tnx a lot for review. > > I did some more profiling and found out that apparently check if > interceptor has a setter might be sometimes expensive. So for this CL > only saves us a lookup on global object. > > What would you say if I try to reserve another bit for fast check if > interceptor has a setter (like has_named_interceptor do)? How precious > these bits are? > > http://codereview.chromium.org/119048 > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ v8-dev mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
