Thanks, Mads. On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Mads Sig Ager <[email protected]> wrote: > I think we have 7 remaining unused bits in our maps currently, so > using one of those to keep track of this sounds good to me. > > -- Mads > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 3:28 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> Kasper, Mads, tnx a lot for review. >> >> I did some more profiling and found out that apparently check if >> interceptor has a setter might be sometimes expensive. So for this CL >> only saves us a lookup on global object. >> >> What would you say if I try to reserve another bit for fast check if >> interceptor has a setter (like has_named_interceptor do)? How precious >> these bits are? >> >> http://codereview.chromium.org/119048 >> >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ v8-dev mailing list [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
