On 2015/02/24 19:33:31, Michael Starzinger wrote:
On 2015/02/24 14:56:13, caitp wrote:
> There's no intent thread yet, just a prototype. If it bumps up from
stage 0
I
> will submit an intent thread. In the mean time, it didn't take very
long to
> write, and I'm using it to get a bit more familiar with the compiler
internals,
> so it's win/win I think.
I am not sure how to interpret this. Does this mean that this CL is not
intended
to be landed (in let's say the next month)? Am I still supposed to do a
thorough
review? Also how will I know when this CL is going from "prototype" to
"implementation"? It's probably just me who is confused at this point.
Actually, I think I was confused --- apparently this proposal has been at
stage
2 since last September (based on
https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/commit/1af3d1e7c24343e6c30bd60bd8b7b0c69ce8bd01),
so this is probably due for an intent thread. The proposal itself was
marked as
stage 0 until last night
(https://github.com/rwaldron/exponentiation-operator/commit/bffe813e0141a29173ec07862c416642c2cd9fd5).
So I will end up writing an intent thread this week.
https://codereview.chromium.org/953563002/
--
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
