On Wednesday 06 May 2009, Josh Sled wrote: > Kevin Thorley <[email protected]> writes: > > I tend to think that the answer to number > > two depends on the answer to number one. > > Right. My take was that there's not enough (collaborative) hacking to > justify growing into a dedicated space, or that isn't served by people's > existing spaces. I hope something like the Arduino night – if sustained > – can help change that. >
Simple clinical observation would bear your sentiments out, josh and kevin; but
is it true?
Or has the concept just not been developed sufficiently? Would hackers from
outside of
chit. co be interested in attending/supporting burl. events?
Or, does our situation reflect not so much interest as much as developing a
decent battle-plan?
Less about $ and more about commitment levels.
CC/IS has its limitations. The space is not THAT large, the pipe is kind of
narrow (BT). Even
the principals of that .org had debated moving to a larger space. But it is a
place and
pretty much shovel-ready.
So, to me, the ? is "is there the will provided that there is a way"?
Rion
--
3010 Rte 109
Waterville, VT 05492
email: rion_at_dluz.com
web: http://dluz.com/Rion/
AIM/Jabber/Google: riondluz
Phone: 802.644.2255
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/6/126/769
Never be afraid to try something new.
Remember, amateurs built the ark.
Professionals built the Titanic. - unknown
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
