As a newb to Emacs, if I were to change one thing about it, it would be its learning curve.
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 10:57 -0400, Tony Harris wrote: > Love Vim. Keep trying to grok emacs because I keep believing with > that eLisp programming language in there it has got to be super > powerful, but can't quite get past the Wordstar finger-pretzel key > combinations. Nano (formerly pico, I believe, from the people who > brought you Pine and now Alpine) is great if you have a few lines to > pop in a really quick change to, but falls out quickly when you need > lots of editor horsepower. > > There. I've done it now. Probably started a holy war over editor > supremecy and possession of the ultimate Truth! ;-) > > --On Tuesday, July 28, 2009 10:49:58 AM -0400 Stanley Brinkerhoff > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > emacs? VIM? anyone hear of the uper better NANO? > > > warmest regards, > > > > > > > Nano is like bringing a golf cart to a tractor pull. I sincerely > hope you > > are joking. If you are not -- have Flint give you an emacs/vi > tutorial. > > > > Stan > > > >
