On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Brian J. Murrell <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 14:13 -0500, Pablo Sanchez wrote: > > On Wednesday 17 December 2008 at 1:54 pm, Brian J. Murrell penned > > about "Re: [vbox-users] Announce: VirtualBox 2.1.0 released!" > > > > > > > > Not that I am necessarily saying this is the case with VirtualBox, but > > > something always worth considering in such discussions... and to quote > > > myself: > > > > > > When your users fail to be baited into upgrades with new > > > features because [of fears] of instability, your users are in > > > fact telling you where they want you to focus your energies. > > > > > > > The above is true ... as long as there is a statistical difference. > > If there are two out of 100 complaining, not worth it ... :p > > Absolutely. By "users" above, I mean "most/all of your users". > > b. > > There were a LOT of users in the forums and here asking how to downgrade and I (and others) even made a tutorial for it because I was getting asked so much. I'm all for using the latest as long as the latest only ADDS to my experience. If I have to spend my time trying to regain the functionality and stability of the old version then I and the companies I'm consulting for are losing money by upgrading. I'm not sure what happened with 2.0.x but something was amiss. Ultimately I need stability first and functionality second. I will be trying 2.1 in a test environment and go from there. Grant McWilliams Some people, when confronted with a problem, think "I know, I'll use Windows." Now they have two problems.
_______________________________________________ vbox-users mailing list [email protected] http://vbox.innotek.de/mailman/listinfo/vbox-users
