Give Ken a breake!
He's pissed off and frustrated after some insulting accusation, and in his
frustration removed the source.
It's just matter of time until the software will be back. It's an issue of
"cooling down".
OK, he might have gone a little far removing the source, but when shit
happens it's good to get positiv feedback.
--
--------------------------------------------
IDG New Media Einar Bordewich
Development Manager Phone: +47 2336 1420
E-Mail: eibo(at)newmedia.no
--------------------------------------------
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael T. Babcock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "dG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "vchkpw / vpopmail mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 4:54 PM
Subject: Re: Removal of the Source Code ?
> dG wrote:
>
> > Unless it is his own code in which case he has the perogative to change
the
> > licenses as he sees fit. This is the case here I believe. My only
point
> > was that to hold back the source in protest of attempts to block the
flow of
> > the source seems to be a bit circular to me and playing into the hands
of
> > the "bad guys".
>
> That's exactly what I was seeing -- and was pointing out the stipulations
of the
> GPL since it seems that Ken inherited the project to some degree and is
not the
> author of all of the code distributed (and therefore doesn't have any
special
> rights over the source code package).
>
>
