At 09:43 AM 03-27-2003, Ron Guerin wrote:
On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 12:40, Paul Theodoropoulos wrote:

> translation: "i don't know the RFC's, I have no basis for claiming that
> other's mailserver are broken, and I'll continue to evade directly
> confronting my error and apologizing for my mistaken claim by pretending to
> take 'the high road'"

I'm not mistaken, I'm just not interested in your diversion.  The RFCs
also don't say it's wrong to reject every third connection.

> you didn't say "what a bad idea it is". you said his mailserver was broken.
> prove it. put up or shut up.

Oh please. Get a clue you ass.

lacking a cogent argument, he resorts to ad hominem. a classic rhetorical diversion. in short: the original claim was baseless. No mailserver is broken for refusing messages from sites that have no in place.

Paul Theodoropoulos
The Nicest Misanthrope on the Net

Reply via email to