On 19 Apr 2007, at 09:41, Alasdair Campbell wrote:

In the original post I was just wondering if xineliboutput has been
written with the matrox specific instructions that softdevice's "-vo
dfb:mgatv" uses. As I don't understand the difference between "-vo
dfb:" & "-vo dfb:mgatv" I can't really say what difference this would

I belive this is entirely dependent on what xine instance you're using with xinelib. Are you using df_xine? I think it should handle field parity correctly.
Torgeir Veimo

vdr mailing list

Reply via email to