On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Tomo <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>  Another ridicilously silly thing is, if I change something like the
> database config file (wich is only different on my local version), or
> application config file, I want to commit stuff without this going up
> with them. Right now, I have to revert the changes to these files and
> then change them back again to proceed with my work. This is horrible.
>
>
I agree with the commit UI changes, but this is a workflow issue.  If you
don't ever want changes to this file to be committed, it shouldn't be in
version control.  For config files, following advice received on this list,
I keep a skeleton default config file versioned, and the actual config file
ignored.  Then you never have to worry about committing this file.

-Ray

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Versions" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/versions?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to