The boatbuilder finally taking the plunge,fair play kev.

>From: "Kevin McClean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [VFB] To Wing or Not To Wing
>Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 14:06:42 -0000
>
>To all interested in winged flies.  I really like tying winged flies wether
>it be a post or a parachute fly.  My favourite is tying split wings from
>either Starling or Mallard.  I would like to host a winged fly swap.  I
>think you can't get enough of these flies and it seems to me that more and
>more people are leaving them out of their flies.  All those interested let
>me know.  I would like to leave lots of time for tying the flies as I know
>that sometimes they can take a while and you have to be in the mood for 
>some
>of the patterns.  I would be thinking of 20 tiers with flies expected here
>in Ireland middle or end of March.  Let me know what your preference is and
>we will go with the majority.
>
>Kevin
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Wally Lutz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 12:46 AM
>Subject: Re: [VFB] To Wing or Not To Wing
>
>
> > Hello All, from the oblivion of  "Distant Lurking" please allow me to 
>add
>my two
> > cents.
> >
> > My confusion starts with the "wingless" fly. It was said here that the
>hackle only
> > imitated the bug's footprint in the meniscus and the fish didn't see 
>much
>more,
> > this vision inaccuracy was then corrected. On this point I believe the
>fish's
> > excellent vision is only part of the picture: the hackle also imitates 
>the
>flutter
> > of a bugs wings and gives the motion of life to a "wingless" fly. 
>Variants
>or
> > American Spiders, for example, are hackle only flying or fluttering
>imitations. If
> > this is true then we have no truly wingless flies: unless it's not a dry
>fly.
> >
> > We have several different types of two winged flies: traditional quill
>segment
> > winged flies, and No Hackle Duns. Both are used for those fish willing 
>to
>take the
> > drifting insect.
> >
> > Rolled wings: made from hair, feather, or synthetic materials, with
>divided or
> > single wings are also an imitation of wings in motion.  Perhaps the
>winging method
> > for those fishes that require the inducement of wing movement to provoke 
>a
>take.
> >
> > Wingless or winged: is this presentation vs. imitation theory? Each 
>school
>of
> > thought serves its purpose, to ignore one or advocate one over the other
>will
> > limit our growth in this sport. By combine the schools into the
>"Behaviourist's"
> > school of fly-fishing that Leonard M. Wright, Jr. in "Fishing the Dry 
>Fly
>as a
> > Living Insect" introduces, we glean the best of it. We don't argue with
>fish:
> > wingless and winged flies are both successful. No doubt, they're fly
>construction
> > techniques that trigger or induce fish to strike.
> >
> > Like the man said, "We've all watched  'em come up to the fly, inspect 
>it,
>and
> > disappear."
> > What are ya gon'a give 'em next, eh?
> >
> > Calm days
> > Wally Lutz
> >
> > Edson AB
> > Lifetime TUC Member
> >
> > http://www.telusplanet.net/public/whlutz/index.html
> >
> >     " The wild fish were as the wild air, no mans possession but the 
>free
>gift of
> > God."
> >
> >
> > Arthur Ransome
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > I know I am going to cause a heavy debate with this one so here it 
>goes.
>I
> > > know when we tie in wings on or dry patterns it makes the fly look
>better and
> > > in some cases I can see how it would make it float better. Here is the
> > > question I am asking; trout do not see the top of the fly all they see
>is the
> > > "footprint", so why put wings on them? The Adams has wings but the
>Flightless
> > > Adams does not and it is just as effective as its older brother and 
>tied
>the
> > > same way with the same materials. So again I ask why wings? The 
>Mosquito
> > > pattern calls for wings and to be honest I have tied them with and
>without
> > > wings and have had better luck with the wingless variety, and only use
>one
> > > hackle in the process too. Hmmmmm, one material fly swap, sounds
>intresting.
> > > Might have to host that one after the Pet Hair Swap. Folks I would 
>like
>to
> > > hear your thoughts and comments on this question.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Bart
> >
>
>
>_________________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>


_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: 
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx

Reply via email to