Let me see if I can explain what I am looking for more clearly. The very first fly I learned to tie was an Adams. I bought one of those packaged kits that has enough material for three or four flies and began tying. Through the years, I have accumulated material, tools, books, etc.
I have been content to tie flies that were good enough to catch a fish or two in the Gunnison, the White River in AR, the wilderness of Maine, and off the Atlantic Coast. However, I do not have the confidence that my flies are worth swapping. I am SURE that the patterns I tie could be improved. You would agree with that. Here's the problem: without something to compare my flies to (other than my own ego or a two dimensional picture) I have no way of judging progress or critiquing myself. Hence the need for a "benchmark" fly. Not one suitable for framing or one to simply collect; just a good working model of a certain pattern. A picture does not allow me to feel the stiffness of a hackle; a view from different angles; to float the fly in a glass of water and see how it rests in the surface film. Suppose I went to the nearest fly shop, closed my eyes, dipped my hand into the Adams drawer and withdrew a fly. Would this fly be a good representation of what a well-tied Adams should look like? I simply do not know. Someone was kind enough to suggest that I eneter lots of swaps and host a few. I will take their advice - and apologize for my flies and solicit critique along the way. Thanks for letting me be part of this list! I am learning with every day - and am in the company of some really great fly folks! Doug
