I have been around for 18 months or so and have never found it to be
clickish.
Since I began, I have been fortunate enough to come across helpful, generous
and knowledgeable people.
I have learnt a load, made friends, and enjoyed everything.
Despite the occasional 'useless' email coming through(I am as guilty as
anyone here), it doesn't take more thank a few seconds to shoot though and
press the delete button.

I wouldn't have it any other way.

Reuven

______________________________________________
Reuven Segal

B. Engineering (Aerospace)- Final Year
B. Engineering (Manufacturing Systems and Management)
RMIT University

5/11 Rockbrook Road,
East St. Kilda, 3183
Melbourne, Victoria
Australia

[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mobile: 0422 266798



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Charlie Bonner
Sent: Saturday, 30 September 2006 3:41 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [VFB] VFB clickish?


When I first arrived on scene here, I thought it was a little clickish at
first but after about a half day and a couple sessions in the chat room I
felt right at home. It may seem a little clickish to some but, I think when
one brings his cards and his/her discussion to the table the clickish part
goes right away. On a brighter note..... I have been fishing some local
ponds for bass with the Davy Wotton Shad and man has it produced for me. I
was fishing Sunday afternoon and found some bass schooling up against a pond
dam. First cast with the Wotton Shad on the 6 weight and WHAM... caught my
biggest bass to date on a fly rod. Right at the 7 lb mark. I ended up
hooking and losing 3 more of that caliber but to no avail could not get them
to bank. The only reason I got the first one in is because it hit the shad
fly right by the bank and I was able to keep him out of the lilly pads. Bass
are schooling here in ARkansas prior to this cool snap. Going to hit the
Little Red on Sunday will post report Monday at work.

CRB


>From: Jeff Frye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: <[email protected]>
>To: <[email protected]>
>Subject: RE: [VFB] VFB clickish?
>Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 22:27:39 -0700 (PDT)
>
>With all due respect to all involved, I found the the
>youmg Barnett boy to be a self promoting poseuar. He
>called himself a professional tyer at age 15 and when
>I hosted an emerger swap, he entered a fly that was a
>size 6 5x long shank hook wrapped with nothing but
>peacock herl. He was a rich kid living a fantasy with
>us at that time. I'm sure he has gine on to better
>things, but he was mostly full of crap. As a test of
>his knowledge, I offered up a supply of imported
>jurango fur for him to tie with. Very exotic and
>highly prized, smuggled in by a buddy of mine that
>travels abroad for his job. Instantly, he could not
>live with the albino jurango nor the rare black
>jurango. He says, that is so hard to get, I can't
>believe you have a source. That was the poker tell. As
>you know, there is no jurango. The beasts go by the
>names of Boomer and Chipper and had a recent grooming.
>I'm a fella that has to call bullcrap when he has to.
>Kid is not going to learn to shoot straight if people
>feed his BS. I'm not sure he ever knew the difference.
>But I wouldn't know as he is a professional fly tyer.
>
>
>--- Neville Gosling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Don O
> >
> > I beg to differ. I recall a situation last winter,
> > when a young VFB member
> > Joshua Barnett who had a signature that included
> > Editor, The Modern Angler
> > Tier and the Back Porch Fly Company who made a
> > comment or seemingly (to me)
> > harmless remark and none other than our late friend
> > Murph jumped all over
> > him. I and several other VFB members e-mailed Murph
> > off list with words to
> > the effect that his comments were not in the spirit
> > of VFB and out of place.
> > To give him credit, Murph apologized publicly via
> > VFB to Joshua but by that
> > time Joshua was already gone - never to return. Now,
> > I respected Murph and
> > tied a fly in his honor when he passed away. The
> > point is we all make
> > mistakes. This is just one example.
> >
> > With regard to your questions, I don't think that
> > there is a conclusive
> > answer to any of them. Many times, different fly
> > tiers in different
> > countries come up with the same or very similar
> > discoveries and techniques.
> > Some make claims that they have innovated, invented
> > or discovered the
> > technique and some don't.
> >
> > Neville (Nev) Gosling
> > Greater Vancouver, BC
> > Canada
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > Behalf Of DonO
> > Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 2:24 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [VFB] VFB clickish?
> >
> > I've been on this list for a very long time, and I
> > can't remember once when
> > a newbie to the list popped on and INTRODUCED
> > HIMSELF/HERSELF to the list
> > and the list as a whole did not welcome him/her
> > wholeheartedly.  I've even
> > seen listers try to talk an 'unsubscribe me' out of
> > unsubscribing.  I've
> > seen Deb and Nick and Chuck and Jimi on and on be
> > welcomed so well that they
> > became 'one of the family' almost instantly.  And
> > I've seen them progress so
> > fast it's scary.  Most of the time a post comes up
> > that says 'unsubscribe
> > me', with a name I'd never seen before.  I'd
> > challenge anyone to get a
> > friend to sign up, who would INTRODUCE HIMSELF and
> > his/her interest in
> > tying, fishing, or whatnot, who would not be
> > overwhelmingly welcomed by the
> > 'GOB' listers that post regularly.  I don't see a
> > click here, just some who
> > regularly post and reply.
> >
> > I can't keep track of who has unsubscribed, as some
> > lurk for a time.  I do
> > know that the 'healthy' discussions we used to have
> > were joined in by a lot
> > of people whom we hadn't heard from in a while =
> > lurkers.
> >
> > I've already made my feelings known in the past
> > about givers and takers.
> > Nothing has changed.  THe VFB is great when a lot of
> > listers are 'givers'.
> > Quit giving, and the list goes dead, like it was
> > when the 'GOB diatribes'
> > started.  If ya git bored, start a thread or a swap.
> >  Start a materials
> > swap.  Find some neat materials and give it away to
> > other listers.  There's
> > lots of ways to make the vfb pleasant.  Study up an
> > a new topic and share
> > the information.  Post fishing reports- I love the
> > photos part.  Search the
> > web and post neat url's. Staying on topic is easy if
> > topics are generated.
> > I loved the fish-cam series.
> >
> > I stayed out of the "who's the best' discussion for
> > personal reasons-
> > competitions are NOT my thing.
> >
> > I would much rather a thread named "Notable
> > Contributions to Tying".  Many
> > times the credit for techniques goes unrecognized or
> > given erroneously to
> > others.  Sometimes it's a pattern, and sometimes
> > it's a technique.
> >
> > I have a list of questions I would like answers to:
> >
> > Who tied the first 'dry fly' ?- intentionally to
> > stay afloat.
> > Who tied the first hair-wing flies?
> > Who tied the first streamer fly?
> > Who was the first to spin deer hair?
> > Who was the first to wind a hackle collar?
> >
> > Whoever did these things are noteable contributors
> > to tying, because so much
> > was built on want they innovated.
> >
> > DonO
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Neville Gosling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 9:51 PM
> > Subject: [VFB] VFB
> > > Are we clicky? I think we are to a point. We
> > should welcome new members
> > more
> > > that we do currently.  When we go off on tangents
> > which I am not
> > interested
> > > in, I just find the delete key. Perhaps we are
> > stale or bored and that is
> > > why the conversation has little to do with fly
> > tying & fishing.
> >
> > > Neville (Nev) Gosling
> > > Greater Vancouver,
> > > B.C. Canada
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > > Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.9/457 -
> > Release Date: 9/26/2006
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>http://mail.yahoo.com


Reply via email to