I would think the more restrictive includes both:  by-nc-sa.

  -- Enric

--- In [email protected], "Andreas Haugstrup"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 24 May 2006 21:11:33 +0200, Enric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Why can't by-sa be mixed with nc-sa?
>
> Because the first stipulates that any new works must be released
under a 
> by-sa license while the second stipulates that the new work must be 
> released under a nc-sa license.
>
> As the CC page says: "Share Alike. If you alter, transform, or build
upon 
> this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under a license 
> identical to this one."
>
> If I choose to release my new work under a by-sa license I will be 
> violating the second person's license. If I choose a nc-sa license I
will 
> be violating the first person's license.
>
> And that's why I don't like Share-Alike licenses. They make remixing
hard 
> and/or impossible.
>
> --
> Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
> <URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ >
> Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.
>






SPONSORED LINKS
Fireant Individual Typepad
Use Explains


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to