I strongly agree with this.  I realize it's "business as usual" for more
traditional media businesses to use award shows as a way to scratch the
backs of their VIPs and biggest stakeholders, but I find something like
that entirely disingenuous in the case of PodTech and the Vloggies.  Not
only that, but it's bad business sense in a market where the largest
stakeholders are ill defined and change every few months.

--
Rhett.
http://www.weatherlight.com/freetime
http://www.weatherlight.com/greentime

> John, this is why you have to talk about this here and not on the
> phone with someone. If you want to engage this community then engage
> us. You can't have private, offline conversations about things like
> this.
>
> For everyone else, if you don't like the way PodTech is handling
> things then DON'T LET THEM HANDLE IT. Don't participate in their
> awards show and don't accept any awards. If nobody recognizes "The
> Vloggies" then it doesn't matter who owns the trademark.  If you still
> want awards then someone will have to organize the community to do it.
>
> - Verdi
>
>
> On 7/24/07, Kent Nichols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Off-list?  If you want to engage my professional services, contact my
>>  agents.  Barrett Garese at UTA.
>>
>>  If you want to talk about the Vloggies, let's talk about the Vloggies
>>  here in public.
>>
>>  I support an open awards show that is owned by no company.  I think
>> that
>>  Trademarking Vloggies gives your company too much control.  The Oscars
>>  are owned by the film industry, and the Emmys are owned by the TV
>>  industry.  There were several sponsors last year, don't they also have
>>  as much right to the mark of the Vloggies as PodTech?
>>
>>  Oh but you have more rights don't you?   Because the person that came
>> up
>>  with the idea, the person that organized it and made it a success was
>> on
>>  your dime...  The person that was just let go, right after the
>> Trademark
>>  was filed...
>>
>>  By landgrabbing "Vloggies", you are trying to own an industry, which is
>>  unconscionable.
>>
>>  You guys are smart, you're just caught in a lot of bad decisions.
>>
>>  You should donate that mark to the Creative Commons, or EFF, or create
>> a
>>  new non-profit that will run the awards.  That would be the right thing
>>  to do, and might start repairing the PR nightmare you guys are
>>  experiencing right now.
>>
>>  -Kent, askaninja.com
>>
>>
>>  --- In [email protected], John Furrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>> wrote:
>>  >
>>  > Kent,
>>  > Email me if you'd like to get involved and we can chat off list
>>  >
>>  > John
>
>
> --
> http://michaelverdi.com
> http://spinxpress.com
> http://freevlog.org
> Author of Secrets Of Videoblogging - http://tinyurl.com/me4vs
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


Reply via email to