For the sake of anyone planning to watch all 30 videos, it would be merciful for us all to limit ourselves to 90 seconds. It will also be easier for the next day's producer to ingest and digest a 90 second video for inspiration rather than a 6 or 10 minute one.
Although it looks like I have the day after Dedman, so I'm kind of hoping to see a 14 minute in-depth meditation on a single slug. On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 8:10 PM, mgmoon <mgm...@yahoo.com> wrote: > I think the length of the video is irrelevant to the challenge. > Some will produce short clips, others may have a whole production planned. > Let loose the reigns that bind the creators. > > Mike > http://vlog.mikemoon.net > > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Rupert Howe <rup...@...> wrote: > > > > Any other views on specific length? > > > > On 21-Oct-09, at 4:22 PM, Jay dedman wrote: > > > > > > This was my instinct, too. Or at most two minutes. I've been doing > > > > this other project with one minute videos, and it works really well. > > > > You can fit quite a lot into a minute. What do other people think? > > > > > > Short is good...especially since each person needs to post their video > > > within 24 hours. I assume we'll have a lot of midnight postings. > > > > > > Jay > > > > > > -- > > > http://ryanishungry.com > > > http://jaydedman.com > > > http://twitter.com/jaydedman > > > 917 371 6790 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
