--- In [email protected], Adrian Miles <adrian.mi...@...> wrote: > > hi all > > absolutely disagree. > > On 10/02/2010, at 6:49 PM, David Jones wrote: > > > If you follow that logic to its logical conclusion, then why have a > > video blog at all?, why not just an audio podcast? > > Or at least why not 160x120 for even more bandwidth saving and speed? > > if you follow that logic to its logical conclusion then why be online > at all and instead be in a cinema, or project via some hi-rez system > against a wall in an installation? <snip> > All power to full screen video, but please don't make an argument that > this is the only way to approach video online.
these are the video size I use QVGA 320x240, VCD-pal 352x288, Quater SDTV-pal 360x288, 400x300 I am about to get a HD camera for panorama videos see for example http://www.ryubin.com/panolab/panoflash/project_bloggie/test01/sample.html tom
