Am Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:09:18 +0200 schrieb Olivier Teuliere: > On 7/27/07, Sebastian Menge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> But since vim is used heavily for c and c++ programming, i guess there >> are many tips in that categories, so i would propose to use only one >> level with c, c++, c# below LanguageSpecific. > > I agree. This is what is currently done with the existing C, C plus plus > and C sharp categories
Then i will repair that subcat of C. > >> C and C++ seem ok ? > > No, C++ is not ok. There is an existing category named like it, and I > didn't find any way to list its contents. Same for C#, probably. OK, didn't notice that. How about CPP or Cpp then? (is this case sensitive too?) I would like to have the category name short, dunno why ... C# is not possible. C sharp is ok? It's case sensitive: C Sharp is a different cat ... or consistent using the file endings: C, Cpp, Cs ? >> How about C/C Plus Plus in tip titles? I would remove it because it's >> in the categories. > > I don't know if we can assume that people always go to the tips using > categories, and particularly using the LanquageSpecific ones. What if > someone goes to the "auto-completion" category, sees a nice-looking > autocompletion tip, opens it, and realizes the tip is not for the > desired language(s)? Perhaps she learns how to adapt it for her language. > I would say that keeping the language name in the title doesn't hurt, if > it's really specific to this language (but we could do s/C PLUS PLUS/C > plus plus/ for example). I don't like those tips with 'C/C plus plus'. They clutter the title too much. BTW for searching, 3 letter queries dont work at the moment, 4 letter words do: compare search results for PHP and Perl ... Seb. _______________________________________________ Vim-l mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/vim-l
