Sebastian Menge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:09:18 +0200 schrieb Olivier Teuliere: > > > On 7/27/07, Sebastian Menge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > >> But since vim is used heavily for c and c++ programming, i guess there > >> are many tips in that categories, so i would propose to use only one > >> level with c, c++, c# below LanguageSpecific. > > > > I agree. This is what is currently done with the existing C, C plus plus > > and C sharp categories > > Then i will repair that subcat of C.
> >> C and C++ seem ok ? > > > > No, C++ is not ok. There is an existing category named like it, and I > > didn't find any way to list its contents. Same for C#, probably. Looks like a "recent" regression because it was OK. If you can find why it isn't accessible anymore, it would be great. > OK, didn't notice that. How about CPP or Cpp then? (is this case > sensitive too?) I would like to have the category name short, dunno > why ... > > C# is not possible. C sharp is ok? It's case sensitive: C Sharp is a > different cat ... > > or consistent using the file endings: C, Cpp, Cs ? I'd rather use the same names as those used on wikipedia -> C -> C++ -- if it can be fixed ... Otherwise I prefer Cpp to C_plus_plus -> C_sharp Hence the initial categories I created. > > I would say that keeping the language name in the title doesn't hurt, if > > it's really specific to this language (but we could do s/C PLUS PLUS/C > > plus plus/ for example). > > I don't like those tips with 'C/C plus plus'. They clutter the title too > much. I agree. I still prefer _(C++), _(C), _(C_sharp), _(Python), _(HTML), ... It's simple and concise. -- Luc Hermitte _______________________________________________ Vim-l mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/vim-l
