On 9/17/07, Tony Mechelynck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Please cut out parts that aren't relevant to what you're replying to.
> Nikolai Weibull wrote: > > What is "lambda" supposed to mean here? > Hm? What is the exact English equivalent? random, average, any, John Q. > Public, typical, ordinary, ... In what language is lambda equivalent to the notion of "chosen at random"? I find no reference to this use in Wikipedia. Using obscure language is hardly a good way of getting your message across. > Oh? Why not have a different buffer-local value for some variable pertaining > to a given autoload script, the way there are buffer-local options? I have a > b:match_words variable in some of my texts; that variable is different for > different 'syntax'es. If matchit was an autoload script, it would be > b:matchit#words or some such. Yes, there are areas where this may make sense, but since these scopes aren't allowed for autoload-script variables, there's no real discussion here. Still, the question is valid. There are basically two scenarios as I see it: 1. Autoload-script variables can only be in the g: scope and, as a result, script#variable can be used consistently to reference "variable" in the autoload script "script", that is, no g: prefix is required anywhere 2. Autoload-script variables can be in other scopes besides g: nikolai --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
