Philippe de Muyter wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 10:20:34PM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > [...] > > The default digraphs now correspond to RFC1345. Most are different from > > what was used in Vim 5.x. Do we care about this incompatibility? Seems like only yesterday :-). > I only noticed that now, switching my linux distro to suse 10.3, and yes, I > really care. I am a french-speaking programmer, so I use a qwerty-us keyboard > beacause it is much easier for programming, but I need sometimes to > produce french texts. > > Previously, I could use the CTRL-K combinations with ` (backquote or grave) > to introduce grave accents, ^ (circumflex) for circumflex accents and " for > diaeresis, juste like on a typing machine. > > RFC1345 recommends : > > ! instead of ` for grave accent > > instead of ^ for circumflex accent > : instead of " for diaeresis > > Frankly I do not understand why RFC1345 has choosen that. > > I know I can add digraphs in .exrc, but it seems to me more logical to add > the french-writing typist combinations directly in the default digraphs of > vim. > > Of course, I do not ask for removal of the !, > and : sequences, only their > duplications with their `, ^ and " counterparts. It seems that we can add these digraphs without breaking the existing ones. Is there anything against adding something like a" for รค, which you currently enter with a: ? -- hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict: 262. Your computer has it's own phone line - but your daughter doesn't. /// Bram Moolenaar -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
