Benjamin Fritz wrote

> A patch is attached for the behavior discussed in these threads:
> http://groups.google.com/group/vim_use/browse_thread/thread/8532e7236f113ab7/0b508a50b767a1e1
> http://groups.google.com/group/vim_dev/browse_thread/thread/56d5debad6f5f351/44cc7eb3b4787440
>
> Also attached is an example of the output when used on the two
> attached patches. I used html_dynamic_folds on the 2html.vim patch,
> and additionally html_no_foldcolumn and html_hover_unfold on the
> syntax.txt patch.
>
> As discussed in the vim_dev thread above, it may be desirable to be
> able to do away with the foldcolumn in the html output, but it was
> hard to determine what to do to allow folds to open and close without
> it. Rather than making the javascript and markup needlessly complex, I
> just used CSS 2.0 :hover selection to open folds on hover if desired
> (though normally, only CSS 1.0 support is required, and a fallback is
> inserted for IE6).
>
> Please comment!
>
> -- Ben


That's very nice and useful.  Thanks.
One minor comment.  In syntax.txt, I read:

  If you use this option, it would not be possible to open the folds

I think it should be...

  If you used this option, it would not be possible to open the folds

:s/use/&d/

-- Dominique

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Raspunde prin e-mail lui