On Jan 17, 7:56 pm, Antony Scriven <adscri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Yes, this is better, but it should be
>
> If you :let html_no_foldcolumn = 1 it
> won't be possible to open the folds unless
> you use :let html_hover_unfold = 1
>
> or whatever the correct usage is. Alternatively remove
> the sentence altogether and say:
>
> :let html_hover_unfold = 1 will use CSS 2.0 to
> allow a user to open a fold by hovering the mouse
> pointer over it. This is useful when using
> :let html_no_foldcolumn = 1.
>
Actually, I was trying to say that html_no_foldcolumn will
automatically set html_hover_unfold. How's this?
----
Using this option, there will be no foldcolumn available to open the
folds in
the HTML. For this reason, another option is provided:
html_hover_unfold.
Enabling this option will use CSS 2.0 to allow a user to open a fold
by
hovering the mouse pointer over it. Note that old browsers (notably
Internet
Explorer 6) will not support this feature. Browser-specific markup
for IE6 is
included to fall back to the normal CSS1 code so that the folds show
up
correctly for this browser, but they will not be openable without a
foldcolumn. Note that using html_hover_unfold will allow modern
browsers with
disabled javascript to view closed folds. To use this option, use: >
:let html_hover_unfold
Setting html_no_foldcolumn with html_dynamic_folds will automatically
set
html_hover_unfold, because otherwise the folds wouldn't be dynamic.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
