On 22/06/11 9:37 PM, Paul LeoNerd Evans wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:45:57AM +1000, Ben Schmidt wrote:
I think as far as we got is a 'model' for how mappings should work.
Approach 4 built on all our discussions and clearly set out how mappings
should conceptually work. There were a number of other raised but
unresolved issues, too. We should gather them together into a neat list,
resolve them (or agree not to resolve them) and then make some kind of
roadmap/implementation plan.
This sounds like a good idea. Do you want to take charge of that bit? I
seem to recall we were heading in about the right direction, with just a
few minor questions here and there around the edges.
I'll see how I go. I might be able to do some work on it next week, but
if not, it'll be about a month before I get a chance. So if you want to
have a go yourself, just jump in.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
