On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 07:57:37PM +1000, Ben Schmidt wrote: > I'll see how I go. I might be able to do some work on it next week, but > if not, it'll be about a month before I get a chance. So if you want to > have a go yourself, just jump in.
In short, no. I don't. In longer: No, I don't want to go anywhere near the source. I have no idea how any of it works, where it lives, what the general developer culture is around it. I don't know what change would be good. I am viewing this totally as an outside observer/user, who knows exactly how it ought to feel from the outside as a black-box, and cares now how it is implemented internally. My biggest mistake in this whole discussion was ever to raise the idea of turning the input queue into a structure queue in the first place. That was me trying to second-guess internals of implementation, and for that I am sorry. I simply wish to be able to actually recognise all the keys independently; ideally by using libtermkey (but I'll admit even that is a stretch of asking-for-internals). Any way this can be made to work will be fine with me. -- Paul "LeoNerd" Evans [email protected] ICQ# 4135350 | Registered Linux# 179460 http://www.leonerd.org.uk/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
