On 7 June 2012 16:09, David Pineau <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > While configuring my indentation, I came across a behaviour that seemed > unintuitive to me (I did not manage to find anything related to this on the > mailling lists, sorry if I missed it). > > When a value in the cinoptions string is described as a shiftwidth value, > the value cannot be zero. > This means that if I write "cino=n0s", the indentation behaves as if I wrote > "cino=n1s". > > Reading the code (in the latest vim mercurial trunk), I found that if the > value and the fraction were equal to 0 when the 's' character is present, > then the value is set to 1 by default. I am aware that writing "n0s" instead > of "n0" may be a stretch, but I found this behaviour disturbing. > > Is this behaviour intended, or is it a unlucky side-effect of the default 1 > shiftwidth width when only the s is present ? > > In the second case, I wrote a little patch that should be easy to apply and > check (Patch retrieved from a mercurial patch queue), that I will join to my > next message if you deem it useful :)
Admittedly, I did not read the message carefully. I just fixed it to find out that you already did that. Next time just go ahead and attach the patch. I guess the behaviour is an unintended side-effect so I attach my version of the patch. Test 3 updated. Cheers, Lech -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
cinoptions-0s.patch
Description: Binary data
