David Pineau wrote: > While configuring my indentation, I came across a behaviour that seemed > unintuitive to me (I did not manage to find anything related to this on the > mailling lists, sorry if I missed it). > > When a value in the cinoptions string is described as a shiftwidth value, > the value cannot be zero. > This means that if I write "cino=n0s", the indentation behaves as if I > wrote "cino=n1s". > > Reading the code (in the latest vim mercurial trunk), I found that if the > value and the fraction were equal to 0 when the 's' character is present, > then the value is set to 1 by default. I am aware that writing "n0s" > instead of "n0" may be a stretch, but I found this behaviour disturbing. > > Is this behaviour intended, or is it a unlucky side-effect of the default 1 > shiftwidth width when only the s is present ? > > In the second case, I wrote a little patch that should be easy to apply and > check (Patch retrieved from a mercurial patch queue), that I will join to > my next message if you deem it useful :)
Why would anyone use "0s"? You can just use "0". I do agree it's counter intuitive. -- How To Keep A Healthy Level Of Insanity: 11. Specify that your drive-through order is "to go". /// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
